Author
Listed:
- Xuezheng Sun
- Annie N Simpson
- Aditi Lahiri
- Sanjida Mowla
- Dana Edelman
- Shelby Corman
- Daniel Fuentes
- Dalibor Kurepa
- Michael W Kuzniewicz
Abstract
Background: Surfactant replacement therapy is central to respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) management in preterm infants, which can be delivered using a variety of methods. Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) has been increasingly adopted due to its association with improved neonatal outcomes. However, there are no procedure codes to identify LISA in large real-world data (RWD), limiting the ability to evaluate its use and effectiveness on a large scale. This study aimed to develop an algorithm to identify LISA procedures using administrative data. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using chart reviews as the gold standard to identify preterm infants receiving surfactant via LISA or non-LISA procedures across Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) facilities. We selected 82 candidate variables from administrative data between birth and date of first surfactant administration. The algorithm was developed using births between 2019 and 2023, which were randomly split into a training set (n = 884) and testing set (n = 379). A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used for variable selection and model fitting. Model discrimination was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Algorithm performance was validated using a combined sample of the testing set and a 2024 birth cohort (n = 622) overall and by gestational age (GA) using sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: Among 1,263 preterm infants who received surfactant, 462 (36.6%) received surfactant via LISA and 801 (63.4%) received surfactant via invasive modalities (ETT or INSURE). The LASSO-based model selected 21 variables predictive of LISA methods based on the training set. The model demonstrated strong discrimination (AUROC = 0.87). Using the maximum specificity cut-point (predicted probability ≥0.79), the model achieved Sn = 43.9%, Sp = 96.8%, PPV = 90.0% and NPV = 72.5%, with an overall agreement of 75.9% when evaluated in the combined testing set and 2024 birth cohort. Sn and Sp were consistent across GA subgroups. Conclusions: We used a machine-learning approach to develop an algorithm that performed well in identifying surfactant administered via LISA among preterm infants using administrative data. The algorithm demonstrated strong performance and can support future research to evaluate the utilization and outcomes of LISA using RWD.
Suggested Citation
Xuezheng Sun & Annie N Simpson & Aditi Lahiri & Sanjida Mowla & Dana Edelman & Shelby Corman & Daniel Fuentes & Dalibor Kurepa & Michael W Kuzniewicz, 2026.
"An algorithm to identify less invasive surfactant administration using a real-world database of preterm infants,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-13, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0345768
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345768
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.