IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345704.html

Psychology at the screen: Investigating the current VAR protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Walker
  • Cara E Staniforth
  • Jordan Thomas
  • Fallon Parker
  • Usman Khizar
  • Nathaniel J Lawton
  • Tamryn Vermaak
  • Jade L Jukes

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the psychological process of the current Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol by calculating, i) the prevalence of overturn/maintain decisions by the referee at the pitch-side monitor, ii) the likelihood that the referee would overturn their decision based on external factors, iii) the likelihood that the VAR would intervene based on external factors. 1520 matches were reviewed across 2021/22–2024/25 seasons in the English Premier League where the referee was advised to consult the pitch-side monitor 250 times, overturning their original decision 95% of the time. Binary Logistic Regression found that external factors did not predict the referee’s decision or VAR intervention. The high prevalence of overturn decisions may be expected as referees are being advised to review potential errors and interestingly maintain decisions were more prevalent when related to the home team, potentially due to proximity bias of the home crowd.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Walker & Cara E Staniforth & Jordan Thomas & Fallon Parker & Usman Khizar & Nathaniel J Lawton & Tamryn Vermaak & Jade L Jukes, 2026. "Psychology at the screen: Investigating the current VAR protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345704
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345704
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345704&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.