IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345614.html

Deep inspiration breath hold versus free breathing in postoperative radiotherapy strategy for patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Pin-Yi Chiang
  • Pin-Jui Huang
  • Chao-Hsiung Hung
  • Ching-Po Lin
  • Chih-Chia Chang

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) compared with free breathing (FB) on dose to the organs at risk (OARs), such as the heart, left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, lungs, and contralateral breast, in patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched for studies until March 21, 2024. Cochrane RevMan version 5.4 statistical software was used to analyze 11 eligible studies. Standard mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence interval for OAR dose reductions, was calculated. DIBH considerably resulted in lower mean doses (Dmean) to the heart (SMD = −1.40 Gy), LAD (SMD = −1.65 Gy), ipsilateral lung (SMD = −0.57 Gy), contralateral lung (SMD = −0.46 Gy), and contralateral breast (SMD = −0.20 Gy). If VMAT was delivered with an arc of >180O, the heart Dmean reduction was even more pronounced. Subgroup analysis revealed that DIBH efficiently reduced heart Dmean, especially in patients with tumor bed boost without nodal irradiation. DIBH was effective in reducing dose to OARs in patients treated with VMAT in all subgroups, i.e., breast only, with/without tumor bed boost, and with/without nodal irradiation. Furthermore, the use of DIBH is strongly recommended for patients undergoing VMAT with a tumor bed boost or without nodal irradiation, as it is more effective in reducing heart Dmean than FB.

Suggested Citation

  • Pin-Yi Chiang & Pin-Jui Huang & Chao-Hsiung Hung & Ching-Po Lin & Chih-Chia Chang, 2026. "Deep inspiration breath hold versus free breathing in postoperative radiotherapy strategy for patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy: A meta-analysis and systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345614
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345614
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345614&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.