IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345422.html

Cost impact of chronic care management services in a large multi-specialty practice: A pragmatic outcomes study

Author

Listed:
  • Bennett W Clark
  • Jacob Webster
  • Souvik Chatterjee
  • Michael D Finch

Abstract

Background: Chronic Care Management (CCM) services represent an underutilized Medicare benefit with potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve care coordination for beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions. Objective: To evaluate the real-world impact of CCM services on healthcare expenditures and patient out-of-pocket costs in a large multi-specialty outpatient practice. Design: Pragmatic retrospective cohort study comparing Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in CCM services versus eligible non-enrolled beneficiaries. Setting: Large multi-specialty outpatient clinic in Alabama with 77 physicians across more than 20 specialties. Participants: Treatment group (n = 6,093) consisted of patients continuously enrolled in CCM services between January 1, 2024 and December 31, 2024. Comparison group (n = 30,432) included eligible patients who were not enrolled in CCM services during the same period. Intervention: Structured CCM program delivered by licensed practical nurses (LPNs) providing monthly telephone or video encounters focused on care plan implementation, medication reconciliation, care coordination, preventive health maintenance, and social determinants of health. Main measures: Per-member-per-year (PMPM) paid amounts and patient out-of-pocket expenditures. Results: The CCM treatment group demonstrated 13.6% lower healthcare costs compared to the comparison group ($96 vs. $110 PMPM). Patient out-of-pocket expenses were 16% lower in the treatment group ($29 vs. $34 PMPM). These savings were achieved despite the treatment group being 2% older on average and including 10% more female beneficiaries—both factors typically associated with higher healthcare costs. Conclusions: Implementation of structured CCM services in a real-world multi-specialty practice setting is associated with reductions in both total healthcare expenditures and patient out-of-pocket costs. These findings support CCM as a practical, cost-effective approach to chronic disease management that benefits patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Bennett W Clark & Jacob Webster & Souvik Chatterjee & Michael D Finch, 2026. "Cost impact of chronic care management services in a large multi-specialty practice: A pragmatic outcomes study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-9, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345422
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345422
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345422&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345422?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.