IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345243.html

Does receiving red yeast rice prescriptions (LipoCol Forte®) increase the risk of end-stage renal disease or not? A retrospective cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Chuen-Chau Chang
  • Fai Lam
  • Chun-Chieh Yeh
  • Jaung-Geng Lin
  • Ta-Liang Chen
  • Chien-Chang Liao

Abstract

Background: The potential relationship between the consumption of red yeast rice (RYR) and the development of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the risk of ESRD in patients who used RYR. Methods: Utilizing insurance claim records from 2010 to 2014, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis comparing 67,876 individuals using RYR against a control group of 90,836 lovastatin users (non-RYR group), with follow-up extending through 2019. The incidence of ESRD was analyzed using adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) within Cox proportional hazard models. Results: During follow-up, the ESRD incidence was 0.9 per 1,000 person-years in RYR users, compared to 3.7 per 1,000 person-years in lovastatin users (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.32–0.40). A dose-dependent reduction in ESRD risk was observed with increasing RYR prescriptions. Sensitivity analysis, excluding ESRD cases within the initial six months, confirmed a persistent association between RYR use and reduced ESRD risk (adjusted HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64–0.81). Conclusion: RYR intake may be linked to a decreased likelihood of progressing to ESRD. Despite these promising results, factors such as medication adherence necessitate cautious interpretation. Further randomized controlled trials are required to validate these findings and clarify RYR’s role in slowing kidney disease progression.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuen-Chau Chang & Fai Lam & Chun-Chieh Yeh & Jaung-Geng Lin & Ta-Liang Chen & Chien-Chang Liao, 2026. "Does receiving red yeast rice prescriptions (LipoCol Forte®) increase the risk of end-stage renal disease or not? A retrospective cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345243
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345243
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345243&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.