IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345205.html

Youth perception of air pollution and the evaluation of governmental environmental performance: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyan Li
  • Rongwang Guo

Abstract

Given that youth are central to societal development and environmental governance, their evaluation of governmental environmental performance is essential for policy refinement and enhanced efficacy. However, the mechanisms linking youth perception of air pollution to such evaluation remain underexplored. Drawing on data from the 2021 China Social Survey (CSS), this study employs an ordered logistic model to investigate this relationship. The results indicate that youth with a heightened perception of air pollution tend to give more negative evaluations of governmental environmental performance. Further mediation analysis using bootstrap methods identified three significant parallel mediators: residential satisfaction, environmental safety perception, and trust in local government. The relative contributions of these mediators were then decomposed and compared using the Karlson-Holm-Breen (KHB) method. These findings highlight the value of incorporating youth perspectives, advance the literature on public evaluations of environmental governance by delineating distinct psychological pathways, and provide empirical evidence for designing targeted policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyan Li & Rongwang Guo, 2026. "Youth perception of air pollution and the evaluation of governmental environmental performance: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345205
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345205
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345205&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Kui & Meng, Chuyan & Yang, Shasha & Zhang, Guanglu, 2024. "Air pollution and individual risk preference: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kikken, Max & Künn, Steffen, 2026. "Air Pollution and Cognitive Performance Under Varying Task Complexity," IZA Discussion Papers 18656, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Zhaoting Xing & Jin Guo & Zizhen Zhang & Ting Xue & Ming Yang & Wenzong Wu, 2024. "Research on the Impact of Environmental Inequality on Labor Mobility—A Study Based on the China General Social Survey (CGSS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Wang, Yao & Wu, Xuenan & Lin, Boqiang, 2025. "Empowering green households: How does digital finance influence household carbon footprints?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Hirsch, Michael & Grund, Christian, 2026. "Dirty Air, Dirty Play: The Effect of Air Pollution on Sabotage in Tournaments," IZA Discussion Papers 18512, IZA Network @ LISER.
    5. Palma, Alessandro & Depalo, Domenico & Curci, Gabriele, 2025. "Air pollution and workplace accidents: Evidence and implications," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.