IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345171.html

Assessment of weight bias among students and health professionals in medical radiation science. A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Theresa O’ Donovan
  • Megan Brydon
  • Aisling Barry
  • Mark McEntee

Abstract

Weight bias is pervasive in health care, contributing to adverse physical and psychological outcomes for affected individuals. While weight bias has been studied in various healthcare contexts, its presence and impact within medical radiation science remain underexplored. This systematic review aims to synthesise the existing literature on the assessment of weight bias in medical radiation science. This protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024506662). Comprehensive searches will be conducted across multiple electronic databases using predefined search strategies. Retrieved records will be imported into Covidence for title and abstract screening, followed by full-text review. Two independent reviewers will assess study eligibility and extract data. Methodological quality will be evaluated using a multi-tool appraisal approach tailored to the design of each study. Risk-of-bias will be assessed, and meta-biases will be explored through the inclusion of grey literature. Confidence in the cumulative evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. This systematic review protocol will provide a comprehensive synthesis of the quantitative assessment of weight bias among professionals and students in medical radiation science. By mapping how weight bias is measured, the findings may support awareness-raising efforts and inform development of strategies to reduce weight bias in education and clinical practice. Once complete, the review will be shared internationally via presentations or posters at conferences. It will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Suggested Citation

  • Theresa O’ Donovan & Megan Brydon & Aisling Barry & Mark McEntee, 2026. "Assessment of weight bias among students and health professionals in medical radiation science. A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345171
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345171
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345171&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.