Author
Listed:
- Young Im Cho
- Hyo Jin Kim
- Dong Hee Kim
Abstract
Nursing students experience stress that negatively affects their mental well-being and academic performance. Conventional mindfulness-based interventions are too long to fit the students’ demanding schedules. This study aimed to examine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an adapted Meditation–Mindfulness–Positive Psychology Training (MMPT) program tailored to nursing students’ needs. The program was designed as to be shorter, to be conducted online, and to be tailored to the needs of nursing students. A mixed-methods pilot study was conducted among junior and senior nursing students in Korea. The experimental group participated in a six-session online MMPT program into which meditation, mindfulness, gratitude journaling, and self-compassion practice were incorporated. Quantitative outcomes were assessed before and after intervention. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed through inductive content analysis. The quantitative results showed significant improvements in gratitude disposition, self-compassion, and perceived stress, but not in mindfulness or overall mental health. Qualitative findings complemented these results by revealing perceived improvements across all target domains, with participants reporting enhanced calmness, greater self-kindness, increased positivity, and stronger coping strategies. Students highlighted the value of gratitude journaling, compassion-based exercises, and supportive peer interactions, which reinforced their engagement and sense of belonging. The MMPT program adapted for this study demonstrated feasibility and preliminary effectiveness in reducing stress and enhancing positive psychological resources among nursing students. By integrating mindfulness and positive psychology into a brief and accessible format, this study underscores the theoretical and practical value of needs-based interventions for supporting nursing students’ well-being. Further large-scale and longitudinal studies are warranted to validate and extend these findings.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.