Author
Listed:
- Samuel Duraivel
- Lavanya Rajendran
- Srinidhi Vasudevan
- Anna Piazza
Abstract
This study investigates public perception of the metaverse through a large-scale computational analysis of 52,874 English-language tweets. Leveraging sentiment analysis tools (VADER and RoBERTa) and unsupervised topic modeling (BERTopic), we categorize discourse into four thematic domains: general metaverse discussion, Meta’s Horizon Worlds, metaverse-related cryptocurrency tokens, and virtual social events. Our findings reveal that 43.0% of tweets express positive sentiment, driven by enthusiasm for immersive innovation and digital transformation, while 23.6% convey skepticism, primarily concerning platform reliability, corporate dominance, and privacy. Sentiment surrounding Horizon Worlds reflects a paradox: underlying optimism is overshadowed by user frustration, with negative tweets generating disproportionately high engagement. Analysis of metaverse token discourse indicates robust investor interest, tempered by persistent concerns over market volatility and fraudulent schemes. Topic modeling further uncovers a notable narrative shift from speculative price-focused discussions toward utility-driven use cases. Virtual events (e.g., digital weddings, concerts) elicit the most positive sentiment (51.3%), with users frequently expressing emotional resonance and communal belonging, as visually reinforced by word cloud analysis. This research contributes to the literature on digital adoption and emerging technologies by mapping the evolving social discourse of the metaverse. It offers actionable insights for platform developers, investors, and educators seeking to align innovation with user expectations and provides a predictive lens for forecasting public readiness for the next generation of digital interaction.
Suggested Citation
Samuel Duraivel & Lavanya Rajendran & Srinidhi Vasudevan & Anna Piazza, 2026.
"Public sentiment and thematic evolution in the metaverse: A large-scale computational analysis of Twitter discourse,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-14, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0345135
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345135
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.