IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0344974.html

Assessing factors that influence perceived burnout in postdoctoral fellows and identifying recommendations to support their well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Suzanne C Harris
  • Emma Smits
  • Robert McGinity
  • Jacqueline M Zeeman

Abstract

Background: While current evidence suggests rates of stress and burnout among healthcare professionals and graduate trainees are up to 50%, higher than the general population, there is a critical gap in the literature concerning factors which influence well-being among postdoctoral fellows in health sciences programs. This exploratory study aims to identify factors influencing well-being and burnout among these postdoctoral fellows and identify recommendations to improve their well-being. Methods: A two-stage sampling approach was used: (1) Purposive sample of postdoctoral fellows employed at a public university were recruited to participate in semi-structured focus groups to assess workplace factors which influence their perceived burnout and well-being and to solicit recommendations to improve well-being; (2) Stratified sampling was used to assign participants into focus groups by industry-sponsored or academic (non-industry-sponsored) positions to explore experiences that may be unique to these groups. Inductive coding and thematic analysis of Zoom transcripts were used. Results: Seven postdoctoral fellows participated in three focus group sessions, with two industry-sponsored fellows in one group, three academic fellows in one group, and two academic fellows in one group. Participants identified insufficient resources, difficult transition, and workload and program structure as factors contributing to their perceived burnout. Factors contributing to their well-being included reasonable supervisor expectations, personal and professional support, and resource support. Participant recommendations to improve well-being included institutional initiatives and resources, additional non-supervisor support, and workload strategies. Conclusions: This study expands upon the sparse literature on postdoctoral fellows by exploring factors that contribute to their perceived well-being and burnout, as well as provide suggestions to support their well-being. Findings contribute to the broader conversation of postdoctoral fellow well-being and burnout and informs the academy of focused strategies to improve their well-being and reduce burnout.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzanne C Harris & Emma Smits & Robert McGinity & Jacqueline M Zeeman, 2026. "Assessing factors that influence perceived burnout in postdoctoral fellows and identifying recommendations to support their well-being," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344974
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344974
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344974&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0344974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.