IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0344926.html

Modest google trends associations with mental health patient and general population deaths by suicide: A time-series analysis using patient-provided search terms

Author

Listed:
  • Lana Bojanić
  • Isabelle M Hunt
  • Sandra Flynn
  • Pauline Turnbull
  • Saied Ibrahim

Abstract

Background: Suicide-related internet use (SRIU), particularly online information seeking, seems to be highly prevalent among mental health patients. Most research using Google Trends to examine suicide-related search patterns relies on researcher-selected terms rather than those actually used by people at risk, limiting ecological validity. No studies have specifically examined associations between volume of suicide-related searches and number of suicides by mental health patients, despite this population’s elevated risk and prevalent SRIU. Methods: This study analysed suicide-related search terms provided by 196 people who had used mental health services in the UK who had engaged in SRIU. From 520 search entries, 36 terms were identified across seven categories and analysed using Google Trends data (2011–2022) for England, Wales, and Scotland. Transfer function modelling with ARIMA/SARIMA models examined cross-correlations between monthly search volumes and the number of suicide deaths by both mental health patients and the general population. Results: Of 448 tested lag correlations, 18 (2.0%) were statistically significant, showing small to medium effect sizes. Most significant associations involved non-specific suicide-related queries (33.3%), characteristics of suicide (22.2%), and help-seeking queries (22.2%). No pro-suicide queries showed significant associations. Concurrent positive correlations were found between search volumes for suicide ideation terms and suicide deaths by mental health patients, and between help-seeking terms and suicide deaths in the general population. Some search terms, including those related to self-poisoning methods and major suicide prevention charities, showed protective associations, with increased searches preceding decreased suicide deaths by 2–3 months. Discussion: The study reveals modest associations between suicide-related search patterns and actual suicide deaths. The associations differed between mental health patients and the general population. The absence of pro-suicide query associations may reflect effective online prevention efforts in the UK. However, the small number of significant correlations indicates limited predictive utility for population-level suicide monitoring, supporting conclusions that Google Trends data alone is insufficient for predicting trends in suicide, though valuable for generating hypotheses about suicide-related internet behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Lana Bojanić & Isabelle M Hunt & Sandra Flynn & Pauline Turnbull & Saied Ibrahim, 2026. "Modest google trends associations with mental health patient and general population deaths by suicide: A time-series analysis using patient-provided search terms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344926
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344926
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344926&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0344926?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.