IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0344849.html

Beyond writing machines: A Kano model analysis of researchers’ hierarchical needs for AIGC services across the research lifecycle

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Kong
  • Tongqiang Dong
  • Ronglong Chen
  • Yunming Wu
  • Ziyi Yang

Abstract

The proliferation of AI-Generated Content (AIGC) tools presents both opportunities and challenges for the academic service ecosystem. However, a systematic understanding of researchers’ multifaceted demands for AIGC functionalities remains underdeveloped, hindering the strategic design and optimization of these services. This study addresses this gap by investigating three core questions: (1) What specific AIGC service functions do researchers desire across the research lifecycle? (2) How can these needs be categorized hierarchically? (3) What is their relative importance in influencing user satisfaction? Employing an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, this research first identified a comprehensive list of 15 service demands through semi-structured interviews with 45 expert researchers (N = 45). Subsequently, these demands were prioritized through a large-scale questionnaire survey involving 412 researchers (N = 412), utilizing the Kano model and Importance-Performance Analysis. The results reveal a clear hierarchy of needs: we identified three must-be attributes (e.g., data security, citation accuracy), seven one-dimensional attributes (e.g., automated literature summarization, language polishing), and five attractive attributes (e.g., generating novel research hypotheses, smart journal recommendation). These findings provide a detailed framework for AIGC service development and offer an evidence-based model for academic institutions to prioritize resource allocation, thereby enhancing the value and adoption of AIGC in scholarly research.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Kong & Tongqiang Dong & Ronglong Chen & Yunming Wu & Ziyi Yang, 2026. "Beyond writing machines: A Kano model analysis of researchers’ hierarchical needs for AIGC services across the research lifecycle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344849
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344849
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344849&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0344849?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack Gallifant & Amelia Fiske & Yulia A Levites Strekalova & Juan S Osorio-Valencia & Rachael Parke & Rogers Mwavu & Nicole Martinez & Judy Wawira Gichoya & Marzyeh Ghassemi & Dina Demner-Fushman & Li, 2024. "Peer review of GPT-4 technical report and systems card," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Mohammed Albekairi & Khaled Kaaniche & Ghulam Abbas & Paolo Mercorelli & Meshari D. Alanazi & Ahmad Almadhor, 2024. "Advanced Neural Classifier-Based Effective Human Assistance Robots Using Comparable Interactive Input Assessment Technique," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.