IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0344702.html

Predictors of burnout among academic family medicine faculty: Looking back to plan forward

Author

Listed:
  • Viola Antao
  • Paul Krueger
  • Christopher Meaney
  • Jeffrey C Kwong
  • David White

Abstract

Objective: To identify the prevalence and predictors of burnout among academic family medicine faculty. Design: A comprehensive survey of academic family medicine faculty on burnout, perceptions of work life, and practice in 2011. Setting: A large, distributed Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto. Participants: All 1029 faculty members were invited to participate. Main outcome measures: Maslach Burnout Inventory three subscales (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment). Results: The survey response rate was 66.8% (687/1029). The prevalence of high emotional exhaustion scores was 27.0% and high depersonalization was 9.2%, whereas the prevalence of high personal accomplishment scores was 99.4%. Bivariate analyses identified 27 variables associated with emotional exhaustion and 18 variables associated with depersonalization, including: ratings of the practice setting; leadership and mentorship experiences; job satisfaction; health status; and demographic variables. Multivariate analyses found four predictors of emotional exhaustion: lower ratings of job satisfaction, poorer ratings of workplace quality, working ≥50 hrs/week, and poorer ratings of health status. Predictors of depersonalization included lower ratings of job satisfaction, ≤5 years in practice, lower ratings of health status, and poor ratings of mentorship received. Conclusions: This study describes the prevalence and predictors of burnout among physicians prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Predictors that are potentially modifiable at local practice and systems levels include job satisfaction, workplace quality, hours worked, and mentorship received. New family physicians (≤5 years in practice) were at increased risk of depersonalization; strategies specific to this group may limit burnout and address the healthcare workforce crisis. Periodic studies are recommended to identify the impact of strategies implemented, emergent predictors, trends, and mitigating factors associated with burnout. The current crisis in family medicine indicates an urgent need to look back and plan forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Viola Antao & Paul Krueger & Christopher Meaney & Jeffrey C Kwong & David White, 2026. "Predictors of burnout among academic family medicine faculty: Looking back to plan forward," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344702
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344702
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344702&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0344702?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.