IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0344617.html

Perception on blackflies and community ownership of the “Slash-and-Clear” vector control intervention in onchocerciasis-endemic communities along Edo-Ondo border in Southern Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Monsuru Adebayo Adeleke
  • John Agbonifo
  • Olabanji Ahmed Surakat
  • Bertram Nwoke
  • Kenneth Opara
  • Hayward Mafuyai
  • Oluwadamilare Ganiu Dauda
  • Dauda Ishola Azeez
  • Olanike Oladipupo
  • Happy Poko
  • Francisca Olamiju
  • Emmanuel Emukah
  • Chukwuemeka Makata

Abstract

Background: Many communities along the Edo-Ondo border in southern Nigeria remain highly endemic for onchocerciasis. Despite more than two decades of mass drug administration (MDA), transmission persists, necessitating the National Onchocerciasis Elimination Committee (NOEC) to designate the zone as special intervention hotspots. Slash-and-Clear (S&C) has emerged as a promising, community-based approach that can be integrated with ongoing MDA campaigns. This study assessed community knowledge of blackfly, onchocerciasis and willingness to sustain S&C without external financial or logistical support. Method: Structured questionnaire was administered to 79 key informants from Edo (n = 59) and Ondo (n = 20) communities along Ose River. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted pre- and post-intervention (April 2023 and April 2025, respectively) with participants from 76 communities that participated in slash-and-clear. Three communities declined due to security and socio-cultural reasons. Results: Prior to intervention, all 79 (100%) key informants reported frequent blackfly bites and expressed the need for strategies to reduce the nuisance. FGD findings corroborated this, with participants recognizing blackflies and their biting burden but showing limited awareness of onchocerciasis as a disease. Common protective measures included wearing long clothing and applying chemical substances on skin to prevent bites. At post-intervention, participants collectively reported noticeable decline in blackfly activity, which reinforced community enthusiasm for sustaining the intervention. Although some communities expressed willingness to continue without monetary incentives, the provision of essential tools and materials was consistently emphasized by majority. Conclusion: The reduction in blackfly nuisance was a motivator for community’s willingness to sustain the intervention. Continued support and routine monitoring by the Edo and Ondo State governments, especially for communities reluctant to participate without financial incentives, are critical to prevent reinfestation in committed areas. This supervision will ensure the broader success of the S&C strategy and the elimination of onchocerciasis in communities along the Edo-Ondo border.

Suggested Citation

  • Monsuru Adebayo Adeleke & John Agbonifo & Olabanji Ahmed Surakat & Bertram Nwoke & Kenneth Opara & Hayward Mafuyai & Oluwadamilare Ganiu Dauda & Dauda Ishola Azeez & Olanike Oladipupo & Happy Poko & F, 2026. "Perception on blackflies and community ownership of the “Slash-and-Clear” vector control intervention in onchocerciasis-endemic communities along Edo-Ondo border in Southern Nigeria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344617
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344617
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344617&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0344617?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.