IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0344467.html

Breaking barriers: A study protocol on unveiling gender, racial and other intersectional dynamics in post-secondary institutions and identifying solutions for advancing primary care and public health research

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Aggarwal
  • Sabrina T Wong
  • Andrea C Tricco
  • Tanvir C Turin
  • Aisha Lofters
  • Gina Agarwal
  • Barnini Bhattacharyya
  • Ivy Lynn Bourgeault

Abstract

Background and objectives: This study protocol employs critical race and intersectionality theories to investigate barriers faced by racialized women at various academic career stages within Canadian primary care (PC) and public health (PH). The objectives are to identify faculty characteristics, examine intersectional barriers, and recommend equity-focused, inclusive strategies and policies. Research design and methods: The study adopts a sequential mixed-methods approach. A quantitative survey and/or existing datasets will be used to collect demographic data on PC and PH academic position holders in Ontario and British Columbia, Canada. Data will also examine experiences of workplace discrimination; equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) resource use; and departmental satisfaction. Subsequently, we will conduct interviews with researchers and leaders who are responsible for hiring and involved in or addressing matters related to EDI. Inductive and deductive approaches will be used to analyze the data in accordance with theoretical frameworks to deepen insights into equity and inclusion in academia. Results: The quantitative phase will profile PC and PH academic position holders, highlighting disparities in positions and leadership roles. The qualitative study will explore intersectional challenges faced by racialized women academic position holders during career progression. Preliminary findings will inform effective equity-promoting strategies. Discussion and implications: This study aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge on gender and racial inequities in academia by uncovering systemic identity-based disparities in the careers of PC and PH researchers in Canada. The findings will inform the development of targeted interventions to promote equitable hiring, faculty support, and leadership advancement, enhancing diversity and productivity through an inclusive and equitable academic environment. Findings will be shared via publications, policy briefs, workshops, and online platforms to engage academics, advocacy groups, funders and policymakers in promoting equity and driving institutional change in PC and PH research.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Aggarwal & Sabrina T Wong & Andrea C Tricco & Tanvir C Turin & Aisha Lofters & Gina Agarwal & Barnini Bhattacharyya & Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, 2026. "Breaking barriers: A study protocol on unveiling gender, racial and other intersectional dynamics in post-secondary institutions and identifying solutions for advancing primary care and public health research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344467
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344467
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344467&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0344467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.