IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0344374.html

A pathway study of university embeddedness in provincial innovation systems based on field theory: Empirical evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhangyuze Wang
  • Yifei Sun
  • Lili Gu
  • Xingguang Ye

Abstract

This study employs Bourdieu’s Field Theory and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to investigate how university-based scientific and technological talent cultivation mechanisms influence Provincial Innovation (PI) capacity in China. Using data from 31 provincial-level regions, two high-performing innovation pathways were identified: (1) a market-driven pathway propelled by technology commercialization and international cooperation; and (2) a government-led pathway defined by robust policy support and institutional coordination. The findings highlight that high-level PI stems from the synergistic integration of HC, ERC, and international scientific exchange. Conversely, four non-high PI pathways reveal that performance is inhibited by resource scarcities, weak institutional frameworks, and ineffective collaboration mechanisms. Those findings indicate that innovation success does not depend on isolated institutional elements, but on the synergy of configurational complementarity Theoretically, this work extends Bourdieu’s Field Theory into the realms of regional innovation and higher education studies. Methodologically, it demonstrates the value of fsQCA in uncovering nonlinear, multi-factor causal mechanisms. Practically, the study offers guidance for localized talent strategies and university reforms aimed at enhancing regional innovation resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhangyuze Wang & Yifei Sun & Lili Gu & Xingguang Ye, 2026. "A pathway study of university embeddedness in provincial innovation systems based on field theory: Empirical evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344374
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344374
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344374&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0344374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.