IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0344213.html

Incidence of mortality and its predictors among low birth weight neonates in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wubet Tazeb Wondie
  • Chalachew Adugna Wubneh
  • Gebrehiwot Berie Mekonen
  • Bruck Tesfaye Legesse
  • Belay Tafa Regassa
  • Daniel Niguse Mamo
  • Zenebe Abebe Gebreegziabher
  • Mariam Alemayehu Abebaw
  • Gezahagn Demsu Gedefaw
  • Leweyehu Alemaw Mengstie
  • Alemu Birara Zemariam

Abstract

Background: Low birth weight neonates are twentyfold at risk of death. Notably, it is a major public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia. Despite the presence of several primary studies on this issue in Ethiopia, the study findings are inconsistent. Hence, this review aimed to assess the pooled incidence and proportion of mortality and predictors among low birth weight neonates. Method: A search of articles from databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus, and HINAR), and other sources (Google, Google Scholar) were done. All observational studies that assess mortality of low birth weight neonates were included. The Joana Brigs Quality appraisal checklist was used. The pooled incidence rate, proportion, and the effect size of predictors were estimated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 test. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis was conducted. Eggers test and funnel plot were used to assess publication bias. Trim and fill analysis was conducted. Result: Fifteen studies with 7539 study participants were included. The pooled incidence rate of mortality was found to be 36.31 (95 CI: 26.37–46.25) per 1000 neonates’ day observation and the proportion of mortality was 26.67% (95% CI: 21.83–31.51). Preeclampsia (AHR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.09–1.75), respiratory distress syndrome (AHR: 1.67; 95% CI:1.25–2.23), perinatal asphyxia (AHR: 1.66; 95% CI: 95%:1.35–2.05), sepsis (AHR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.59–2.63), not breastfeeding (AHR:5.16; 95% CI: 2.61–9.96), not using KMC (AHR: 4.46, 95% CI: 2.19–9.10), extremely low birth weight (AHR: 3.67; 95% CI: 2.55–5.29), very low birth weight (AHR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.44–2.12), and prematurity (AHR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.07–2.24) were predictors. Conclusion: Based on the pooled proportion of mortality, above one-fourth of low birth weight neonates died in Ethiopia, and the incidence rate of mortality was significantly high. Preeclampsia, respiratory distress syndrome, perinatal asphyxia, sepsis, not breastfeeding, not using kangaroo mother care, hypothermia, extremely low and very low birth weight, and prematurity were predictors of mortality. Hence, the concerned stakeholder should focus on LBW neonates presented with these predictors. Maternal and neonatal screening, kangaroo mother care, and breastfeeding need to be strictly practiced to reduce mortality. Furthermore, community-based essential newborn care needs to be strengthened. Registration: CRD42024524189.

Suggested Citation

  • Wubet Tazeb Wondie & Chalachew Adugna Wubneh & Gebrehiwot Berie Mekonen & Bruck Tesfaye Legesse & Belay Tafa Regassa & Daniel Niguse Mamo & Zenebe Abebe Gebreegziabher & Mariam Alemayehu Abebaw & Geza, 2026. "Incidence of mortality and its predictors among low birth weight neonates in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344213
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344213
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344213&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0344213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.