IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0344211.html

Influence of COVID-19 on postoperative prognosis and pain management

Author

Listed:
  • Yue-Zi Hu
  • Zai-Long Qin
  • Wen Tang
  • Zhao-Lan Hu
  • Ru-Yi Luo

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected healthcare, particularly surgical care. Although short-term effects on surgical outcomes have been examined, understanding of long-term postoperative prognosis and pain management in COVID-19 patients remains limited. This knowledge gap is critical as the pandemic evolves and the need for optimized postoperative care becomes increasingly important. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 infection on postoperative outcomes and pain management in surgical patients. We aimed to assess surgical mortality, complication rates, and postoperative pain levels in COVID-19-positive patients relative to a closely matched control group. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU following surgery. Data were collected on baseline characteristics, postoperative complications, mortality and pain scores. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models were used to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 infection on postoperative pain. Stratified and interaction analyses were additionally performed to examine the robustness of these associations across subgroups. Results: Mortality rates and the incidence of sepsis were significantly higher in the COVID-19 cohort. Patients with COVID-19 also experienced longer duration of mechanical ventilation in the ICU and prolonged ICU stays. In the fully adjusted multivariate linear regression model, COVID-19 infection was positively associated with higher postoperative visual analog scale pain scores (β = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.03–1.98; p

Suggested Citation

  • Yue-Zi Hu & Zai-Long Qin & Wen Tang & Zhao-Lan Hu & Ru-Yi Luo, 2026. "Influence of COVID-19 on postoperative prognosis and pain management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344211
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344211
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344211&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0344211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.