Author
Listed:
- Iqbal Taufiqqurrachman
- Andro Pramana Witarto
- Ari Fahrial Syam
- Murdani Abdullah
- Sigit Ari Saputro
- Irine Normalina
- Muhammad Miftahussurur
- Yoshio Yamaoka
Abstract
Background: Autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by the destruction of gastric parietal cells. The invasive nature of diagnostic procedures and risk of confounding factors hinder the development of reliable diagnostic tools for AIG. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of four databases. After assessing the study quality using the ROBINS-E tool, a meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the sources of heterogeneity and impact of study bias, Results: The pooled mean difference in total serum ghrelin (pmol/L) between patients with AIG and healthy controls was −65.28 (95% CI: −178.54, 47.97). Subgroup analysis showed that the mean differences in serum ghrelin for mild, moderate, and severe atrophy were −78.85 (95% CI: −165.17, to 7.48), −91.97 (95% CI: −183.11, to −0.84), and −110.67 (95% CI: −204.77, to −16.56), respectively. The sensitivity analysis confirmed that the exclusion of studies with high-risk bias did not significantly alter the results. Meta-regression indicated that BMI contributed substantially to heterogeneity. Conclusions: Although total serum ghrelin levels were not significantly different between patients with AIG and healthy controls, significantly lower levels were observed in patients with moderate-to-severe gastric atrophy. Given the high heterogeneity and limitations of existing studies, the diagnostic utility of serum ghrelin in AIG warrants further investigation.
Suggested Citation
Iqbal Taufiqqurrachman & Andro Pramana Witarto & Ari Fahrial Syam & Murdani Abdullah & Sigit Ari Saputro & Irine Normalina & Muhammad Miftahussurur & Yoshio Yamaoka, 2026.
"Diagnostic potential of total serum ghrelin in autoimmune gastritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-13, March.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0344129
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344129
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.