Author
Listed:
- Whitney Wells
- Jillian Hebert
- Chloe W Eng
- Catherine dP Duarte
- Anusha M Vable
Abstract
Purpose: Education is a strong predictor of cognitive aging, but little work has evaluated the relationship between early childhood education (ECE) specifically and cognition in midlife and beyond. Methods: Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 Cohort (n = 7,129), we examined the relationship between attending preschool, Head Start (federally-funded free ECE targeted for low-income families), or no ECE, and midlife global cognition. We defined midlife global cognition based on immediate and delayed word recall, serial 7 subtraction, and backwards counting. We used multivariable linear regression models to estimate overall associations and associations among groups more likely eligible for Head Start, and to evaluate heterogeneities by sex, race and ethnicity, and family socioeconomic status (SES). Results: Overall, preschool, but not Head Start, was associated with better midlife cognition compared to no ECE in some models. Among families more likely eligible for Head Start, we found not only that preschool (β = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.51) was associated with better midlife cognition, but also directionally positive evidence that Head Start (β = 0.09; 95% CI: −0.08, 0.27) was associated with better midlife cognition. Associations varied; Head Start was associated with higher midlife cognition for Black and Hispanic men and people with higher family SES marginalization compared to other groups. Conclusions: This study provides initial evidence suggesting that early childhood education may be associated with better cognition more than 40 years later, especially for Black and Hispanic men and people who faced greater socioeconomic marginalization.
Suggested Citation
Whitney Wells & Jillian Hebert & Chloe W Eng & Catherine dP Duarte & Anusha M Vable, 2026.
"Is early childhood education associated with better midlife cognition, especially for children facing socioeconomic marginalization?,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-15, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0343880
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343880
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.