IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0343839.html

Knowledge, attitude and practice of invasive mechanical ventilation protocolized weaning among ICU nurses and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Li Wang
  • Yating Yu
  • Yan Zhu
  • Qin Zhang
  • Lei Sun
  • Juan Chen
  • Li Xiao
  • Ping Jia

Abstract

Background: Many foreign countries have implemented protocolized weaning led by respiratory therapists (RTs) or nurses, which can reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation. At present, the implementation of ventilator weaning in China is led mainly by doctors. Objective: To investigate the status quo of the knowledge, attitudes and practices of adult intensive care unit (ICU) nurses in tertiary hospitals concerning invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) protocolized weaning and to analyze its influencing factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from September to November 2023 in 30 tertiary hospitals in Sichuan, Chongqing, and Nanjing, and included a total of 700 nurses. Data were collected using a questionnaire designed by the research team. The questionnaire consisted of 39 items, including 3 dimensions: knowledge (concepts and precautions of protocolized weaning, weaning screening and spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) evaluation, SBT methods, extubation knowledge), attitude (professional perceptions, personal beliefs, learning willingness) and practice (implementation of weaning screening assessment and SBT, implementation of extubation). Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25. Univariate analysis was performed using a t test or analysis of variance, while multifactor analysis was conducted using multiple linear regression analysis. Results: A total of 700 questionnaires were recovered, and after the exclusion of invalid questionnaires, 643 valid responses remained. Among the 643 nurses, 65.47% were from the general intensive care unit (GICU), 86.00% of nurses’ ICU weaning were led by doctors, 43.08% of nurses did not participate in the knowledge of weaning training after work, and 94.56% expressed their willingness to participate in the training of protocolized weaning. The total standardized score of the knowledge, attitudes and practices related to the protocolized weaning of ICU nurses was 82.70 ± 10.69 points, and the standard scores for the dimensions of knowledge, attitudes, and practices were 78.50 ± 16.67, 87.96 ± 10.76, and 76.53 ± 15.51, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that the correlation coefficients between knowledge and attitude, knowledge and practice, and attitude and practice were 0.274, 0.325, and 0.491, respectively, which were significantly positive correlations (P

Suggested Citation

  • Li Wang & Yating Yu & Yan Zhu & Qin Zhang & Lei Sun & Juan Chen & Li Xiao & Ping Jia, 2026. "Knowledge, attitude and practice of invasive mechanical ventilation protocolized weaning among ICU nurses and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343839
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343839
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343839&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0343839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.