IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0343797.html

Assessment of acute pain and its management in an urban emergency department in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Kwabena Antwi-Donkor
  • Jonathan Boakye-Yiadom
  • Godfred Boakye
  • Ama Antwi-Donkor
  • Abigail Mensah Hammond
  • Johnpaul Amenu
  • Enoch Opoku Afriyie
  • Richard Delali Agbeko Djochie
  • Michael Arthur Ofori
  • Ronald Feldman. Maio

Abstract

Introduction: Acute pain is classified as pain that lasts less than three to six months. Globally, pain is the third most common health problem with more than a quarter of patients reporting to the Emergency Department (ED) with pain-related chief complaints. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of acute pain and assess the pain management practices in the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital Emergency Department (KATH ED). Methods: Using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the characteristics of acute pain among 378 patients presenting to KATH ED were measured. Additionally, the waiting time for the first pain treatment was calculated for each patient. Pain scores (pre- and post-treatment) were also taken to further inform patients’ satisfaction. Results: Out of 378 patients, 76% [95% CI: 71.3–80.2] reported to the ED with severe pain, 21% [95% CI: 16.9–25.4] reported with moderate pain, and 3% [95% CI: 1.5–5.1] reported with mild pain. The average waiting time for the initial assessment of pain was 83.97 minutes while the average waiting time for the administration of analgesia was 184.07 minutes. Having completed primary (AOR, 5.36; 95% CI, 1.03–27.97), JHS (AOR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.19–28.35), SHS (AOR, 7.24; 95% CI, 1.38–38.01) and tertiary (AOR, 9.42; 95% CI, 1.60–55.62) were predictive of Door‑to‑Analgesia (DTA) time ≤ 90 minutes. Nearly three quarters of the study participants had maximum satisfaction with the pain management services in the ED. Conclusion: The study revealed that documentation of pain severity scores of patients presenting with acute pain at KATH ED was encouraging, however, most patients did not receive timely pain relief. The average waiting time for the initial assessment of pain as well as the administration of analgesia was extremely prolonged. Despite this, three out of every four of the study participants had maximum satisfaction for the overall pain treatment services in the ED. These findings suggest that pain management practices at KATH ED need improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwabena Antwi-Donkor & Jonathan Boakye-Yiadom & Godfred Boakye & Ama Antwi-Donkor & Abigail Mensah Hammond & Johnpaul Amenu & Enoch Opoku Afriyie & Richard Delali Agbeko Djochie & Michael Arthur Ofori, 2026. "Assessment of acute pain and its management in an urban emergency department in Ghana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343797
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343797
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343797&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0343797?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.