IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0343736.html

Frontline decision autonomy under decentralization: Evidence from health sector reform

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Zarychta
  • Krister Andersson
  • Thomas Bossert

Abstract

Decentralization is designed to transfer autonomy from more central to more local actors, yet studies show differences in the autonomy realized under these reforms. Drawing on the case of health sector decentralization in Honduras, we utilize the decision space approach and original data for over 600 frontline health workers in a matched sample to explain facility-level autonomy. We find that reported decision autonomy in four functional areas is slightly reduced under decentralization, reductions are most pronounced where decentralization is led by municipal governments or associations, rather than NGOs, and differences across staff types are modest. Furthermore, capacity and resources are necessary for expanded autonomy, particularly in organizing service delivery, while supportive accountability allows for increased autonomy in human resources and finances. Our research shows the importance of including frontline staff in studies of decision autonomy under decentralization and considering the distribution of autonomy across levels in hierarchical service delivery systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Zarychta & Krister Andersson & Thomas Bossert, 2026. "Frontline decision autonomy under decentralization: Evidence from health sector reform," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343736
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343736
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343736&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0343736?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.