IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0343694.html

Vigi4Eudra-score: Evaluation of the completeness of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports in EudraVigilance

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Christ
  • Diana Dubrall
  • Dennis Lex
  • Thomas Grüger
  • Matthias Schmid
  • Bernhardt Sachs

Abstract

Introduction: The vigiGrade completeness score established in VigiBase, the worldwide ADR database, measures the completeness of information provided in the structured format of each ADR report. Currently, no such measurement is implemented in the European ADR database EudraVigilance. The aim of our study was to adjust the algorithm of the vigiGrade completeness score to the structure of the ADR reports from EudraVigilance (=Vigi4Eudra-score). Materials and methods: An R script was developed to semi-automatically assess the completeness of structured information provided in the ADR reports extracted from EudraVigilance. The script was applied to four different datasets. We compared the values achieved by the Vigi4Eudra-score to those of the vigiGrade completeness score per ADR report. Results: Approximately 15,000 spontaneous reports from the four datasets were assessed. The mean values of the Vigi4Eudra-score of all four datasets ranged from 0.41–0.59. Compared to the values of the vigiGrade completeness score, most commonly, none or only minor discrepancies were found. These were largely attributed to the categories that needed to be adapted for use within EudraVigilance. Conclusions: We provide an R script to assess the completeness of information provided in the structured format of ADR reports from EudraVigilance, which may be useful for researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory authorities. Our use cases demonstrate its successful application.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Christ & Diana Dubrall & Dennis Lex & Thomas Grüger & Matthias Schmid & Bernhardt Sachs, 2026. "Vigi4Eudra-score: Evaluation of the completeness of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports in EudraVigilance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343694
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343694
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343694&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0343694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.