IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0343232.html

The problem is escalating: Barriers faced by medical students in conducting research; A scoping literature review

Author

Listed:
  • L Winter Mokhwelepa
  • G Olivia Sumbane
  • Shisana Baloyi
  • Samuel Risenga
  • Tumisang Malete

Abstract

Background: Research is a cornerstone of medical education, equipping future healthcare professionals with critical thinking skills and the ability to apply evidence-based practices. Despite its importance, medical students often encounter numerous obstacles that hinder their active participation in research. These challenges not only affect students’ academic growth but also limit the advancement of medical knowledge and innovation within the healthcare system. Aim: This study aimed to review, map, and synthesize the barriers that hinder medical students from engaging in research, and to provide insights that can inform educational reforms and policy interventions to strengthen research capacity among medical students. Methods: The authors followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Scoping review guidelines. The initial search was conducted in January 2025 and concluded in August 2025. A comprehensive literature search was performed across three major electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The following key terms were used: “medical students”, “research barriers”, “research participation”, “challenges”, and “medical education”. Only peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2010 and 2025 that examined barriers faced by medical students in conducting research were included. Studies focusing on non-medical or postgraduate students, non-English articles, editorials, and abstracts without full texts were excluded. Results: Fifty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The review identified key barriers hindering medical students’ engagement in research, including limited mentorship, heavy academic workload, and insufficient research training. Institutional challenges such as inadequate funding and poorly structured curricula further restricted participation. Conclusion: Improving mentorship, research training, and institutional support is crucial to empower medical students and foster greater engagement in research.

Suggested Citation

  • L Winter Mokhwelepa & G Olivia Sumbane & Shisana Baloyi & Samuel Risenga & Tumisang Malete, 2026. "The problem is escalating: Barriers faced by medical students in conducting research; A scoping literature review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343232
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343232
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343232&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0343232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rakan K Alhabib & Noara Alhusseini & Anas G Aboalsamh & Ghaith Adi & Aya Ismail & Amro Hajja & Duaa Alammari & Ziad Khalil & Maha A Alharbi & Sarah K Albahiti, 2023. "Motivators and barriers to research participation among medical students in Saudi Arabia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-11, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.