IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0343152.html

Construct validity of the Arabic version of the opinion relative to integration of student with disabilities scale

Author

Listed:
  • Khalid N Alasim
  • Bandar M Almohayya

Abstract

This study investigated the construct validity and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Opinion Relative to the Integration of Students with Disabilities (ORI) scale. Data were collected from 400 general and special education teachers as well as university faculty members. Exploratory factor analyses revealed a four-factor structure explaining 51.37% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis of the 15-item model demonstrated acceptable fit after item refinement. Subscale Cronbach’s α values ranged from.60 to.78, reflecting acceptable but marginal internal consistency in some subscales, with a total α of.75 (Cronbach’s α = .60–.78; total α = .75). Reliability indicators were further evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and the convergent validity was assessed using the Average Variance Extracted (AVE), and Pearson correlation. The findings indicate that university faculty members and teachers generally hold positive attitudes toward inclusion and confirm that the Arabic ORI is a reliable and valid tool for assessing such attitudes. These results provide evidence supporting the instrument’s use in research and policy initiatives aimed at promoting inclusive education across Arabic-speaking contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Khalid N Alasim & Bandar M Almohayya, 2026. "Construct validity of the Arabic version of the opinion relative to integration of student with disabilities scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343152
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343152
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343152&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0343152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.