IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0342981.html

Role of ethics, meritocracy, and professionalism in public sector reforms: A Q methodology study

Author

Listed:
  • Munshi Muhammad Abdul Kader Jilani
  • Samira Tasnim
  • Nahian Rahman
  • A S M Rafad Asgar
  • Nasim Ahmed

Abstract

Public sector reforms are crucial for improving governance efficiency, accountability, and service delivery. Their success, however, hinges on key factors such as ethics, meritocracy, and professionalism. This study utilizes Q methodology to explore various perspectives on public sector reforms, drawing on New Public Management (NPM) theory to identify critical priorities and challenges in reform implementation. By employing a structured sorting technique, the study captures stakeholders’ subjective viewpoints in governance and public administration, revealing six distinct perspectives. The findings highlight the vital role of ethical governance (Factor 1) in fostering transparency and public trust while also stressing the importance of strong political will to reduce political interference (Factor 2). Furthermore, the institutionalization of meritocracy and professionalism (Factor 3) is essential for improving administrative efficiency, minimizing bureaucratic inefficiencies, and creating clear career pathways. A collaborative approach that incorporates civil society and private-sector engagement (Factor 4) is also deemed necessary for sustaining reform efforts. However, deeply rooted bureaucratic cultures and institutional resistance (Factor 5) pose significant obstacles to the implementation of reform. Additionally, the study emphasizes the need for continuous learning, leadership development, and adaptive governance strategies (Factor 6) to ensure the long-term sustainability of reforms. The variety of stakeholder perspectives indicates a complex interaction of ethical considerations, political dynamics, bureaucratic structures, and professional development needs. This research contributes to the discourse on public sector transformation by offering policy recommendations for ethical leadership, merit-based policies, and professional capacity building. Future studies should investigate these dynamics across different governance systems to reinforce institutional reforms worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Munshi Muhammad Abdul Kader Jilani & Samira Tasnim & Nahian Rahman & A S M Rafad Asgar & Nasim Ahmed, 2026. "Role of ethics, meritocracy, and professionalism in public sector reforms: A Q methodology study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-28, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342981
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342981
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342981&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0342981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas Barrios & Frank Muci & Jessie Lu & Jorge Tudela Pye & Miguel Angel Santos & Nikita Taniparti & Ricardo Hausmann, 2022. "A Growth Diagnostic of Namibia," Growth Lab Working Papers 183, Harvard's Growth Lab.
      • Douglas Barrios & Frank Muci & Jessie Lu & Jorge Tudela Pye & Miguel Angel Santos & Nikita Taniparti & Ricardo Hausmann, 2022. "A Growth Diagnostic of Namibia," CID Working Papers 405, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    2. Almaz Nasyrov, 2022. "Civil Service Reform in Kyrgyzstan: Challenges and Threats," Springer Books, in: Alikhan Baimenov & Panos Liverakos (ed.), Public Service Evolution in the 15 Post-Soviet Countries, chapter 0, pages 251-285, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.