IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0342837.html

Limited capital? Explaining transatlantic divergences in artificial intelligence startup financing

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Hermann Hennings
  • Dirk Schiereck

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a global general-purpose technology (GPT), yet the financial systems that scale AI ventures differ markedly across regions. This paper compares AI-focused venture capital (VC) dynamics in Europe and the United States from 2000 to 2025 using approximately 8,000 AI-related VC rounds from PitchBook and macroeconomic and institutional data from the World Bank. Exploiting the 2021 generative-AI inflection point as a common technological shock that triggered a structural reallocation of venture capital toward AI ventures, we apply a difference-in-differences (DiD) design to distinguish between startup formation and scale-up financing. Descriptive evidence shows that Europe keeps pace with the US in AI deal counts, suggesting no major pipeline gap in startup formation. However, Europe lags substantially in AI investment volumes and in AI’s share of total VC funding. In the Post-period, AI accounts for around 60% of VC investment volume in the US, compared to roughly 31% in Europe. Difference-in-differences estimates are consistent with parallel trajectories in AI deal activity but point to large and statistically significant transatlantic gaps in AI investment volume and investment intensity. These results are robust to macroeconomic and governance controls, a formal event-study test of pre-treatment trends, and a sensitivity analysis that excludes the United Kingdom (which alone accounts for roughly 31% of European VC volume), a placebo test using a false treatment year, and the exclusion of the COVID-19 period. Interpreting the findings through GPT diffusion and the Varieties of Capitalism framework, we interpret the pattern as being consistent with the US liberal market economy having a structural advantage in mobilizing large-scale risk capital. The results inform current debates on European technological sovereignty, the Capital Markets Union, and AI-related policy initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Hermann Hennings & Dirk Schiereck, 2026. "Limited capital? Explaining transatlantic divergences in artificial intelligence startup financing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(11), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342837
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342837
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342837&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0342837?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.