Author
Listed:
- Michael Strauss
- Muhammad Osman
- Sue-Ann Meehan
- Florian M Marx
- Anneke C Hesseling
- Andrew Boulle
- Pren Naidoo
- Gavin George
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) patients who are diagnosed but not registered and initiated on TB treatment are categorised as initial loss to follow-up (ILTFU). ILTFU is a key driver of morbidity and mortality associated with TB and is a contributing factor to high TB transmission rates. LINKEDin was a quasi-experimental study which evaluated two specific interventions for reducing ILTFU in three high-TB burden provinces in South Africa, conducted from October 2018 to December 2020. As part of LINKEDin, we undertook a micro-costing from the healthcare provider perspective using an activity-based costing approach. Cost estimates included the cost of the operation of an integrated provincial health data centre in the Western Cape, apportioned to the TB activities it supported in the province. Cost estimates were linked to intervention outcomes to understand the incremental cost of the intervention per additional patient linked to care compared to rates of ILTFU in the absence of the interventions. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainty in the intervention outcomes, and for periods where the implementation of the intervention was interrupted due to COVID-19 related disruptions. Costing data were collected between August 2020 and March 2021. The total cost of implementing the LINKEDin intervention in the WC and KZN was $7 534.42 per month. The cost of implementing LINKEDin in the Western Cape accounted for 56% the total cost of the intervention – 8% from the operations of the PHDC and 48% from the cost of running the intervention – while only 44% of the total cost was accounted for by the intervention run in KwaZulu-Natal. The primary cost driver of the interventions were staff salaries, with the cost of data extraction and in-hospital activities low relative to primary healthcare (PHC)-based follow-up activities. In terms of cost effectiveness, the LINKEDin interventions in KZN was cost $377.28 per additional person linked to care, and $243.62 in the WC, per additional person linked to care. In the Western Cape, systematically tracking persons with TB using an automated system proved highly cost efficient compared to the more labour intense approach adopted in KwaZulu-Natal. Optimising the curation and management of data and increasing the effectiveness of tracing systems and processes can result in cost-savings.
Suggested Citation
Michael Strauss & Muhammad Osman & Sue-Ann Meehan & Florian M Marx & Anneke C Hesseling & Andrew Boulle & Pren Naidoo & Gavin George, 2026.
"An economic evaluation of the LINKEDin study: An intervention to reduce initial loss to follow-up among tuberculosis patients in South Africa,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-12, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0342708
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342708
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.