IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0342582.html

The effect of patient experience with nurses and ward type on intention to recommend: Focusing on integrated nursing and caring service wards and general wards, 2020–2022

Author

Listed:
  • Jinsun Kim
  • Seungju Kim

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compared inpatients’ intention to recommend hospitals between integrated nursing and caring service wards (INCSW) and general wards (GW), and examined between patients’ experiences with nurses and recommendation intention. Methods: This study analyzed 943 inpatients (INCSW = 223, GW = 720) using the Korea Medical Service Experience Survey (2020–2022). Intention to recommend and nurse experience were measured on 5-point Likert scales and treated as approximately continuous, a common approach that supports the use of multivariable linear regression. Ward differences were assessed using t-tests, and effect sizes were summarized using Cohen’s d. Results: Patients in INCSW reported higher recommendation intention than those in GW (Mean 4.11 vs 3.98), with a small effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.27). However, ward type was not independently associated with recommendation intention in the fully adjusted model. All nurse experience domains were positively associated with recommendation intention, with courtesy showing the largest coefficient (β = 0.27, 95% CI 0.17–0.37). Conclusion: Although recommendation intention was slightly higher among INCSW patients in unadjusted comparisons, ward type was not independently associated with willingness to recommend after adjustment. In contrast, all nurse experience domains were positively and significantly associated with patients’ willingness to recommend the hospital. Strengthening nurse communication competencies, supported by ward-level monitoring and feedback-based training, may enhance patient experience and willingness to recommend.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinsun Kim & Seungju Kim, 2026. "The effect of patient experience with nurses and ward type on intention to recommend: Focusing on integrated nursing and caring service wards and general wards, 2020–2022," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342582
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342582
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342582&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0342582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael van den Berg & Candan Kendir & Diana Castelblanco & Nicolas Larrain & Frederico Guanais & Oliver Groene & Pilar Illarramendi & Jose Maria Valderas & Rachel Williams & Mieke Rijken, 2024. "PaRIS Field Trial Report: Technical report on the international PaRIS survey of people living with chronic conditions," OECD Health Working Papers 166, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.