IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0342486.html

Who cares about mental health? Benchmarking the issue importance of mental health for American voters”

Author

Listed:
  • Jake Haselswerdt

Abstract

Existing scholarship on public opinion and mental health in the US has emphasized variations in Americans’ stated support for policies or investments intended to address mental health. This work has shown that overall support for these policies is quite high, suggesting that scholars of public opinion may be focusing on the wrong dependent variable. This study asks a different question: to what degree is mental health an important voting issue for Americans, and what groups consider it especially important? Using a high-quality nationally representative sample of 1000 American adults from the 2024 Cooperative Election Study, I use recently developed experimental methods to assess how important hypothetical candidates’ position on a mental health policy proposal (the Better Health Care for Americans Act) is to vote choice relative to nine other salient policy issues, including border security, abortion, and student loan forgiveness. The results suggest that mental health is of substantial importance, and especially so for liberals, higher-income people, and those in relatively poor health. These findings suggest that championing action on mental health could bring political rewards to policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jake Haselswerdt, 2026. "Who cares about mental health? Benchmarking the issue importance of mental health for American voters”," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-9, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342486
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342486
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342486&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0342486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.