Author
Listed:
- Nikki E Rossetti
- Samantha Morrison
- Su-Hsin Chang
- Yan Yan
- Graham Jaensch-Frie
- Charles R Liu
- Nahom Y Seyoum
- Meghna Katta
- Arvind Kumar
- Zhizhou Yang
- Christian Oncken
- Christy Hamilton
- Nicholas Schroy
- Kyle Stumbaugh
- Gary Marklin
- Brendan Heiden
- Brendon Cummiskey
- Sarah Peskoe
- Matthew Hartwig
- Varun Puri
- Ana A Baumann
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in transplantation science, a persistent shortage of donor lungs continues to limit access to life-saving lung transplants. The Lung Donor (LUNDON) Acceptability Score is a validated tool that predicts donor lung utilization and post-transplant recipient outcomes, but integration into practice remains limited. This study will evaluate determinants of LUNDON score adoption, its impact on clinical decision-making, and develop tools to support its implementation. Methods: This is a multi-aim mixed-methods pre-implementation study that will be conducted across U.S. Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) and lung transplant centers. Aim 1 will identify barriers and facilitators of LUNDON score adoption through surveys (n = 242 participants) and interviews (n = 60 participants) of OPO and transplant providers. Aims 2 and 3 will evaluate the impact of the LUNDON score on donor management and organ acceptance using simulation-based experiments with OPO coordinators, OPO clinical leadership, transplant pulmonologists, and transplant surgeons (n = 120 total). Aim 4 will synthesize findings to develop and pilot implementation toolkits across three OPOs and three transplant centers. Two implementation frameworks [the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)] will guide data collection and analysis, integrating quantitative and qualitative findings. Expected impact: Findings from this collaborative, nationally supported study involving partners from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the national lung transplant community will inform the development of toolkits to support LUNDON score adoption in clinical practice, with the goal of reducing variation in donor management and increasing donor lung utilization. Future studies will explore the effect of LUNDON score adoption on donor lung utilization and recipient outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Nikki E Rossetti & Samantha Morrison & Su-Hsin Chang & Yan Yan & Graham Jaensch-Frie & Charles R Liu & Nahom Y Seyoum & Meghna Katta & Arvind Kumar & Zhizhou Yang & Christian Oncken & Christy Hamilton, 2026.
"Implementing the Lung Donor (LUNDON) acceptability score in U.S. donor management and transplant decision-making: A multi-aim, mixed-methods protocol,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-13, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0342383
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342383
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.