IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0342377.html

US workforce gaps in emergency management: A mixed-methods approach of demographics, capacity, and community engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Ananya Verma
  • Lorraine A Schneider
  • Rita V Burke

Abstract

Introduction: Within emergency management, few studies have analyzed the shifting landscape of the workforce in the United States. As emergency management is an evolving field, it is important to note changes in the profession. The purpose of this study was to examine the current emergency management workforce, specifically analyzing its demographic breakdowns, organizational concerns, and community-based dynamics. The intent was to determine if the workforce is representative of the communities they work in. Disasters are known to disproportionately impact vulnerable populations, making it more important for emergency managers to be demographically and functionally diverse to effectively reach and prepare these communities. Methods: Using a mixed-methods approach, data were gathered through five focus group sessions, and using themes from the focus groups, a large-scale survey was designed and disseminated to seven emergency management organizations across the country. The survey collected responses for three weeks, and participants were offered the opportunity to enter a raffle for a $100 gift card. The focus group data were analyzed using Atlas.ti, and the survey data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Results: In total, 20 emergency managers participated in the focus groups, and 232 participants completed the survey. Our analysis showed high levels of concern regarding an overall lack of funding and resources within organizations. Other concerns included insufficient representation of historically underrepresented populations, limiting emergency managers’ capacity to effectively engage their communities. Conclusions: This study identifies key challenges within the evolving emergency management workforce, most notably limited funding, the risk of burnout, underrepresentation of minority groups in leadership, and lack of standardization. At the same time, encouraging trends are emerging, including greater gender diversity and growing participation from younger professionals. The findings provide a foundational overview to guide future research on strengthening and supporting the workforce and the communities they serve.

Suggested Citation

  • Ananya Verma & Lorraine A Schneider & Rita V Burke, 2026. "US workforce gaps in emergency management: A mixed-methods approach of demographics, capacity, and community engagement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342377
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342377
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342377&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0342377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.