IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0342292.html

Social determinants of healthy aging: An investigation using the all of us cohort

Author

Listed:
  • Wei-Han Chen
  • Yao-An Lee
  • Huilin Tang
  • Chenyu Li
  • Ying Lu
  • Yu Huang
  • Rui Yin
  • Melissa J Armstrong
  • Yang Yang
  • Gregor Štiglic
  • Jiang Bian
  • Jingchuan Guo

Abstract

Introduction: The increasing aging population raises significant concerns about the ability of individuals to age healthily, avoiding chronic diseases and maintaining cognitive and physical functions. However, the pathways through which SDOH factors are associated with healthy aging remain unclear. Methods: This retrospective cohort study uses the registered tier data from the All of Us Research Program (AoURP) registered tier dataset v7. Eligible study participants are those aged 50 and older who have responded to any of the SDOH survey questions with available EHR data. Three different algorithms were trained (logistic regression [LR], multi-layer perceptron [MLP], and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]). The outcome is healthy aging, which is measured by a composite score of the status for 1) comorbidities, 2) cognitive conditions, and 3) mobility function. We evaluate the model performance by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and assess the fairness of best-performed model through predictive parity. Feature importance is analyzed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. Results: Our study included 99,935 participants aged 50 and above, and the mean (SD) age was 74 (9.3), with 55,294 (55.3%) females, 67,457 (67.5%) Whites, 11,109 (11.1%) Hispanic ethnicity, and 44,109 (44.1%) are classified as healthy aging. Most of the individuals lived in their own house (64%), were married (51%), obtained college or advanced degrees (74%), and had Medicare (56.2%). The best predictive model was XGBoost with random oversampler, with a performance of AUROC [95% CI]: 0.793 [0.788–0.796], F1 score: 0.697 [0.692–0.701], recall: 0.739 [0.732–0.748], precision: 0.659 [0.655–0.663], and accuracy: 0.716 [0.712–0.720], and the XGBoost model achieved predictive parity by similar positive and negative predictive values across race and sex groups (0.86–1.06). In feature importance analysis, health insurance type is ranked as the most predictive feature, followed by employment status, substance use, and health insurance coverage (yes/no). Conclusion: In this cohort study, XGBoost model accurately predicted individuals achieving healthy aging, outperforming LR and MLP. Our findings underscore the significant role of health insurance in contributing to healthy aging.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei-Han Chen & Yao-An Lee & Huilin Tang & Chenyu Li & Ying Lu & Yu Huang & Rui Yin & Melissa J Armstrong & Yang Yang & Gregor Štiglic & Jiang Bian & Jingchuan Guo, 2026. "Social determinants of healthy aging: An investigation using the all of us cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342292
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342292
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342292&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0342292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.