Author
Listed:
- Christopher Wang
- Elianna Schimke
- Tristan Kako
- Aiden Gao
- Martina Lamberti
- Joost le Feber
- Sarah Marzen
Abstract
Biological organisms have sensors that communicate information about the environment. Analyzing how well these biological sensors function has usually been done with mutual information between the sensor signal and the environment, but that can be computationally intractable and summarize something quite complex with just a single number. We suggest that alternatively, one may profitably analyze these biosensors using bias and variance or confusion matrices, depending on the kind of environment. Stimulus-dependent Maximum Entropy models are used to develop estimators of the environmental state given the sensor state, and these estimators in turn are then used to calculate either the bias and variance of the estimator or confusion matrices. We focus on several examples to understand the utility of non-information-based analyses: ligand-receptor binding models spanning from genetic regulation to neuronal communication to bacterial chemotaxis and spin-glass Ising models for neural activity in cultured neurons. These new computationally efficient analyses add insight into existing analyses based on mutual information; in particular, mutual information estimates give one number to characterize responses to all environmental inputs, and this analysis method characterizes how sensors respond to each environmental input. Categorical analyses, meanwhile, indicate the presence of memory without much prediction in confusion matrix elements in cultured neural networks, adding to previous understanding from mutual information estimates.
Suggested Citation
Christopher Wang & Elianna Schimke & Tristan Kako & Aiden Gao & Martina Lamberti & Joost le Feber & Sarah Marzen, 2026.
"Analyzing an organism’s sensors using Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) models with bias, variance, and confusion matrices,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-22, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0342165
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342165
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.