IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0342024.html

Research on the equilibrium strategy of data value co-creation in water conservancy engineering projects based on differential game theory

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaowei An
  • Xi Chen
  • Guanghua Dong
  • Lingli Zhang

Abstract

Water conservancy engineering projects are characterized by long construction cycles, multiple participants, and dispersed data, resulting in low efficiency in data resource utilization. Therefore, data value co-creation is needed to enhance the value of data elements. This study develops a three-party dynamic differential game model of data value co-creation involving the contractor, designer, and owner. Both centralized and decentralized decision-making scenarios are considered, and a government subsidy mechanism is introduced to analyze multi-party collaborative decision-making behavior and its influencing factors. The results show that: (1) Under the centralized decision-making scenario, both the data value level and the total returns from data value co-creation are higher than those under the decentralized decision-making scenario. Centralized decision-making is more conducive to maximizing data value. (2) Government subsidies can increase the level of effort and returns of participating subjects, thereby incentivizing these subjects to engage in data value co-creation. (3) The cost coefficient of data value co-creation for participating parties has an inhibitory effect on their willingness to engage in data value co-creation. In contrast, an increase in the utility coefficient can significantly enhance their willingness. The research findings can provide theoretical support for data value co-creation practices in water conservancy projects and for the formulation of related policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaowei An & Xi Chen & Guanghua Dong & Lingli Zhang, 2026. "Research on the equilibrium strategy of data value co-creation in water conservancy engineering projects based on differential game theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342024
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342024&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0342024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.