IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0341960.html

Does access to finance condition firms’ green investment responses to environmental pressure? Evidence from Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Dinh Duc Truong

Abstract

Environmental regulation is widely viewed as a key driver of firms’ green investment, yet evidence remains mixed, particularly in emerging economies where financial constraints are pervasive. This study examines whether environmental pressure is associated with firms’ green investment and whether this relationship is conditioned by financial constraints. Using firm-level data from the World Bank Enterprise Survey in Vietnam, we estimate nonlinear probability models with interaction terms, controlling for firm characteristics as well as industry and regional fixed effects. The results show that environmental pressure is positively associated with green investment, but the magnitude is modest. Financial constraints significantly reduce the likelihood of green investment and weaken firms’ responses to environmental pressure. Marginal effects indicate that regulatory pressure is more likely to translate into investment among firms facing lower financial constraints, while the association becomes negligible for financially constrained firms. These findings highlight a conditional mechanism through which environmental regulation operates. Regulatory pressure alone is insufficient to induce widespread green investment when financial constraints are binding. Instead, its effectiveness depends critically on firms’ financial conditions. By providing firm-level evidence from an emerging economy, this study contributes to a more integrated understanding of how regulatory and financial factors jointly shape environmental investment behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinh Duc Truong, 2026. "Does access to finance condition firms’ green investment responses to environmental pressure? Evidence from Vietnam," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341960
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341960
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341960&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0341960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Johnstone & Ivan Haščič & David Popp, 2017. "Erratum to: Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 441-444, October.
    2. Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), 2010. "Handbook of the Economics of Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1.
    3. Ayyagari, Meghana & Demirguc-Kunt, Asli & Maksimovic, Vojislav, 2012. "Financing of firms in developing countries : lessons from research," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6036, The World Bank.
    4. Yuyu Zhan & Yuan Wang & Yifan Zhong, 2023. "Effects of green finance and financial innovation on environmental quality: new empirical evidence from China," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 2164034-216, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joëlle Noailly & Roger Smeets, 2022. "Financing Energy Innovation: Internal Finance and the Direction of Technical Change," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(1), pages 145-169, September.
    2. Cameron Hepburn & Jacquelyn Pless & David Popp, 2018. "Policy Brief—Encouraging Innovation that Protects Environmental Systems: Five Policy Proposals," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(1), pages 154-169.
    3. Popp, David, 2012. "The role of technological change in green growth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6239, The World Bank.
    4. Graf, Holger & Kalthaus, Martin, 2018. "International research networks: Determinants of country embeddedness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7), pages 1198-1214.
    5. Martin Kalthaus, 2020. "Knowledge recombination along the technology life cycle," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 643-704, July.
    6. Joelle Noailly; Roger Smeets, 2021. "Financing Energy Innovation: Internal Finance and the Direction of Technical Change," CIES Research Paper series 69-2021, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.
    7. Kirsten Svenja Wiebe & Ulrike Lehr & Christian Lutz, 2013. "Green change – endogenizing technical progress in the renewable power generation sector," EcoMod2013 5117, EcoMod.
    8. Lehmann, Paul & Gawel, Erik, 2013. "Why should support schemes for renewable electricity complement the EU emissions trading scheme?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 597-607.
    9. Paulo Vitor Levate & Eduardo Gonçalves & Juliana Gonçalves Taveira, 2021. "Regional drivers of green inventions in OECD countries," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 335-354, December.
    10. Joelle Noailly & Roger Smeets, 2019. "Do Financing Constraints Matter for the Direction of Technical Change in Energy R&D?," CIES Research Paper series 58-2018, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.
    11. Sun, Huaping & Edziah, Bless Kofi & Kporsu, Anthony Kwaku & Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2021. "Energy efficiency: The role of technological innovation and knowledge spillover," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Shouro Dasgupta & Enrica De Cian & Elena Verdolini, 2016. "The Political Economy of Energy Innovation," Working Papers 2016.35, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    13. Ma, Rufei & Cai, Huan & Ji, Qiang & Zhai, Pengxiang, 2021. "The impact of feed-in tariff degression on R&D investment in renewable energy: The case of the solar PV industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Jia, Xiao & Takeuchi, Kenji, 2024. "Induced innovation in power generation technologies: Evidence from the Tokyo–Saitama Emissions Trading System," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    15. Elena Verdolini & Valentina Bosetti, 2017. "Environmental Policy and the International Diffusion of Cleaner Energy Technologies," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 66(3), pages 497-536, March.
    16. repec:isu:genstf:201501010800005678 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Stucki, Tobias & Woerter, Martin, 2019. "The private returns to knowledge: A comparison of ICT, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies, and green technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 62-81.
    18. Shouro Dasgupta, Shouro & De Cian, Enrica & Verdolini, Elena, "undated". "The Political Economy of Energy Innovation," MITP: Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways 234939, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    19. Martin Kalthaus, 2017. "Identifying technological sub-trajectories in photovoltaic patents," Jena Economics Research Papers 2017-010, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    20. Bosetti, Valentina & Verdolini, Elena, 2013. "Clean and Dirty International Technology Diffusion," Economy and Society 150374, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    21. Marit E. Klemetsen, 2015. "The effects of innovation policies on firm level patenting," Discussion Papers 830, Statistics Norway, Research Department.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.