Author
Listed:
- Eleanor S I Greenway
- Lorenzo L Elias
- Antonella Consiglio
- Andrea Bellodi
- Blondine Agus
- Jurgen Batsleer
- Karen Bekaert
- Pierluigi Carbonara
- Manfredi Madia
- Mauro Sinopoli
- Michele Palmisano
- Ilse Maertens
- Jan Jaap Poos
Abstract
Direct ageing of elasmobranch species comes with many challenges where the success of preparation methods tends to be species-specific. In this study, we compare age estimations from different preparation methods concerning vertebral location (anterior and posterior), vertebral structure (whole and sectioned), and vertebral staining (stained and unstained) for three skate species: Raja brachyura, Raja clavata, and Raja montagui. Age estimations were derived from modal ages of eight age readers from Dutch, Belgian, and Italian institutions. Only vertebrae from the same individual, where both conditions of the preparation method were available, were used in the analysis. Precision measures based on modal ages were variable but consistent with other elasmobranch ageing studies. For all species, anterior vertebrae showed lower CV values on average compared to posterior vertebrae. APE and CV were lower whole vertebrae compared to sectioned vertebrae regardless of vertebral location or staining, for all species. Age bias plots showed age estimations were significantly higher (p
Suggested Citation
Eleanor S I Greenway & Lorenzo L Elias & Antonella Consiglio & Andrea Bellodi & Blondine Agus & Jurgen Batsleer & Karen Bekaert & Pierluigi Carbonara & Manfredi Madia & Mauro Sinopoli & Michele Palmis, 2026.
"A comparison of vertebral preparation techniques for increasing reader precision and agreement in vertebral band pair identification of Northeast Atlantic skates,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-25, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0341911
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341911
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.