IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0341902.html

Human movement patterns predict task-unrelated thought

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron Y Wong
  • Anaëlle E Charles
  • Caitlin Mills
  • Nick Stergiou
  • Aaron D Likens

Abstract

The cognitive phenomenon, known as task-unrelated thought, reflects the attention shift of one’s mind away from the task at hand. Evidence suggests that task-unrelated thought occurs in 30–50% of people’s waking time. Previous research using the metronome response task shows that task-unrelated thought is related to variability in response time magnitude. However, those studies did not account for the time varying characteristics of an individual’s tapping behavior. In the current study, three research questions were investigated: (1) What is the relationship between task-unrelated thought and movement dynamics (finger tapping dynamics)? (2) How does the statistical structure of external stimuli influence task-unrelated thought? (3) Does this structure moderate the relationship between task-unrelated thought and finger tapping dynamics? Participants performed the metronome response task under four different metronome structures: NoTone, Persistent, Periodic, and Random. Participants synchronized their finger to the metronome tone for each condition and self-reported the occurrence of task-unrelated thought. Overall, an increase of the Hurst exponent resulted in a decrease of task-unrelated thought probability. The findings have implications that behavioral variability has value in detecting task-unrelated thought. Additionally, studies using the metronome response task should account for the impact of the tone structure being used. Future research is warranted in this field to truly understand the mechanism behind task-unrelated thought and its link to human movement variability.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron Y Wong & Anaëlle E Charles & Caitlin Mills & Nick Stergiou & Aaron D Likens, 2026. "Human movement patterns predict task-unrelated thought," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341902
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341902
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341902&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0341902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.