IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0341859.html

Effect of stem cell therapies on tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in animal models: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Shibo Zhao
  • Congcong Wang

Abstract

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is widely performed, yet insufficient tendon-bone healing remains a key contributor to graft failure. Stem cell-based interventions, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and stem cell-derived products (e.g., exosomes/extracellular vesicles), have shown potential to enhance tendon-bone integration in preclinical models. However, findings across animal studies are heterogeneous and have not been comprehensively synthesized. This review aims to evaluate the effects of stem cell-based therapies on tendon-bone healing after ACL reconstruction in animal models. Methods and analysis: This protocol follows PRISMA-P. We will search PubMed, Embase, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to the final search date. Controlled animal studies comparing ACL reconstruction with stem cell-based interventions versus controls will be included. Primary outcomes are biomechanical properties (ultimate failure load and stiffness). Secondary outcomes include micro-CT measures of bone integration (e.g., bone volume fraction, bone mineral density) and histological outcomes (e.g., interface maturation or validated scoring systems). Risk of bias will be assessed using SYRCLE’s tool. Random-effects meta-analyses will be performed, with prespecified subgroup analyses by stem cell type, delivery method, animal species, and follow-up time. Sensitivity analyses and publication-bias assessments will be conducted where appropriate. PROSPERO registration: CRD420251137985.

Suggested Citation

  • Shibo Zhao & Congcong Wang, 2026. "Effect of stem cell therapies on tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in animal models: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-7, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341859
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341859
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341859&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0341859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.