IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0341665.html

Exploring heterogeneity in treatment effects: The impact and interaction of asset-based wealth and mass azithromycin distribution on child mortality

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth A Gebreegziabher
  • Ali Sié
  • Mamadou Ouattara
  • Mamadou Bountogo
  • Boubacar Coulibaly
  • Valentin Boudo
  • Thierry Ouedraogo
  • Elodie Lebas
  • Huiyu Hu
  • Pearl Anne Ante-Testard
  • Steven E Gregorich
  • Kieran S O’Brien
  • Michelle S Hsiang
  • David V Glidden
  • Benjamin F Arnold
  • Thomas M Lietman
  • Catherine E Oldenburg

Abstract

Objective: To examine how child mortality among children aged 1–59 months varies by asset-based wealth status in rural Burkina Faso, and to assess the interaction between mass azithromycin (AZ) distribution and wealth status on child mortality at both the household and community levels. Methods: We used data from a cluster-randomized trial and population census data on household characteristics and assets. A wealth index score for each household, used to classify the population by wealth, was generated using principal component analysis. We used the Relative Index of Inequality (RII), the Slope Index of Inequality (SII), and the concentration index to assess wealth-related inequalities in mortality, and the Gini Index to assess variability in child mortality across households and communities. Poisson regression models were used, with person-time at risk included as an offset, and robust standard error to estimate changes in mortality rates by wealth and treatment arm. Interaction was assessed on both the multiplicative and additive scales. Results: Mortality declined with increasing wealth at both the household and community levels, with a significant gradient at the community level (RII = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.05–1.29; SII = 2.3 per 1,000 person-years, 95% CI: 0.2–4.4), reflecting higher mortality among the poorest. The effect of AZ did not vary significantly by wealth index, and changes in mortality rates across wealth levels were similar between the two treatment arms. There was no evidence of a statistically significant interaction between AZ and asset-based wealth on either the multiplicative or additive scale at the household or cluster level. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate a wealth gradient in child mortality, with the highest mortality rates observed among households and communities in the lowest wealth quintiles. These disparities were consistent across both AZ-treated and placebo groups, suggesting that the role of AZ in health disparities may be limited to addressing gaps in treatment access rather than broader wealth-related disparities. While the study may have been underpowered to detect modest interaction effects, AZ appeared to offer similar benefits across economically diverse communities, with no evidence suggesting enhanced benefits for disadvantaged communities or for prioritizing treatment based on wealth status. Further work is needed to address the wealth-related disparities in child mortality in these communities. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03676764

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth A Gebreegziabher & Ali Sié & Mamadou Ouattara & Mamadou Bountogo & Boubacar Coulibaly & Valentin Boudo & Thierry Ouedraogo & Elodie Lebas & Huiyu Hu & Pearl Anne Ante-Testard & Steven E Greg, 2026. "Exploring heterogeneity in treatment effects: The impact and interaction of asset-based wealth and mass azithromycin distribution on child mortality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341665
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341665
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341665&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0341665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.