IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0341570.html

Health insurance status and hearing aid utilization in U.S. older adults: A population-based cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Kaitlin Hori
  • Albert Li
  • Diego E Razura
  • John Parsons
  • Janet S Choi

Abstract

Background: The role of health insurance and its diverse hearing health benefits on hearing aid utilization is currently unknown. The objective of this study is to examine rates of ever and regular hearing aid (HA) use by insurance status in older U.S. adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2005–2018). Older adults (≥65 years) with complete data on health insurance, audiometry, and hearing aid use (n = 3,172) were included. Eight combinatorial insurance categories were created and compared pairwise to the reference of Medicare only coverage. Outcomes included ever and regular hearing aid use. Results: Among older U.S. adults, 30.3% [95% CI:27.6%−33.2%] of those with audiometry-measured hearing loss reported ever using HAs while 22.9% [95% CI:20.3%−25.7%] reported regular HA use. Among older adults with hearing loss, those with military-related insurance (Tricare, VA and Champ-VA) had amongst the highest rates of ever and regular HA use (43.3% [95% CI:31.3%−56.2%] and 30.8% [95% CI:21.1%−42.5%], respectively). Ever HA use rates for individuals with Medicare and Medicaid was 30.8% [95% CI:27.8%−33.8%] and 17.7% [95% CI:11.9%−25.5%], respectively. In a multivariable model adjusting for demographics and hearing loss severity, individuals with military-related and military-related+Medicaid insurance were significantly more likely to report ever using HAs compared to those with Medicare only (OR 1.80, 95% CI:1.03–3.16; OR 20.38, 95% CI:1.07–386.84, respectively). Those with military-related insurance were more likely to report regular HA use (OR 2.17, 95% CI:1.16–4.09). Conclusion: In this nationally representative study of older U.S. adults, we found differences in ever and regular HA use rates by insurance status, even when adjusting for hearing loss, demographics, and comorbidities. Future research is warranted to investigate group-specific differences, including access to hearing care, hearing health benefits, and stigma, to better understand the facilitators and barriers to hearing aid use by insurance status.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaitlin Hori & Albert Li & Diego E Razura & John Parsons & Janet S Choi, 2026. "Health insurance status and hearing aid utilization in U.S. older adults: A population-based cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341570
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341570
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341570&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0341570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goman, A.M. & Lin, F.R., 2016. "Prevalence of hearing loss by severity in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(10), pages 1820-1822.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junhun Lee & Chul Young Yoon & Juhyung Lee & Tae Hoon Kong & Young Joon Seo, 2024. "Clinical characteristics of the “Gap” between the prevalence and incidence of hearing loss using National Health Insurance Service data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Mengzhen Qin & Mengyuan Qiao & Yuying Dong & Haiyan Wang, 2025. "Development and validation of a depression risk prediction model for middle-aged and elderly adults with sensory impairment: Evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Chunfeng Yun & Zhenjie Wang & Jiamin Gao & Ping He & Chao Guo & Gong Chen & Xiaoying Zheng, 2017. "Prevalence and Social Risk Factors for Hearing Impairment in Chinese Children—A National Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Barbara Millet & Hillary A. Snapp & Suhrud M. Rajguru & Natasha Schaefer Solle, 2023. "Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Perceptions of Hearing Health and Protection among Florida Firefighters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Po-Ting Lin & I-Hsun Li & Hui-Wen Yang & Kuan-Wei Chiang & Chih-Hung Wang & Li-Ting Kao, 2021. "Illegal Drug Use and Risk of Hearing Loss in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-10, November.
    6. Yee Mang Chan & Norhafizah Sahril & Ying Ying Chan & Nor’ Ain Ab Wahab & Norliza Shamsuddin & Muhd Zulfadli Hafiz Ismail, 2021. "Vision and Hearing Impairments Affecting Activities of Daily Living among Malaysian Older Adults by Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Corinna Trujillo Tanner & Jeremy Yorgason & Avalon White & Chresten Armstrong & Antonia Cash & Rebekah Case & Joshua R. Ehrlich, 2023. "Longitudinal Analysis of Social Isolation and Cognitive Functioning among Hispanic Older Adults with Sensory Impairments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-13, July.
    8. West, Jessica S. & Smith, Sherri L. & Dupre, Matthew E., 2023. "The impact of hearing loss on trajectories of depressive symptoms in married couples," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.