IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0341568.html

Determinants of the quality of life of care partners in the context of surgical cardiovascular interventions: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Parmis Mirzadeh
  • Eric M Horlick
  • Maral Ouzounian
  • Mark Osten
  • Miranda Witheford
  • Rima Styra

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death globally, and numerous patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery rely heavily on informal care partners, often spouses or close family members for support. While much of the existing literature focuses on caregiver burden, particularly in dementia-related conditions, less is known about the specific factors influencing the quality of life (QoL) of care partners in the context of surgical cardiovascular interventions. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted at a tertiary cardiac center to identify the key factors that influence the QoL of care partners of patients who have undergone or are undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Twenty care partners of cardiac or vascular patients participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews explored emotional, physical, financial, and social dimensions of the care partner’s experience. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent factors influencing care partner QoL. Results: Participants were predominantly female (80%) and most often spouses of the patients (55%). Thematic analysis revealed several interrelated domains affecting care partner QoL: financial stress (e.g., lost income, travel costs), emotional impact, communication with healthcare teams, care partner physical health limitations, and availability of social support. Patient-related factors such as the type and urgency of surgery, post-operative condition, and patient attitude also significantly influenced care partner experiences. These findings highlight the multifaceted nature of care partner QoL and its direct connection to patient outcomes. Conclusions: This study identifies core factors that impact the well-being of care partners of cardiovascular patients and emphasizes the importance of their role in supporting recovery. The results provide a framework for identifying at risk care partners for poor patient outcomes, and consideration of early intervention and tailored support. Integrating care partner needs into healthcare planning may improve both patient and care partner outcomes in cardiovascular surgical care settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Parmis Mirzadeh & Eric M Horlick & Maral Ouzounian & Mark Osten & Miranda Witheford & Rima Styra, 2026. "Determinants of the quality of life of care partners in the context of surgical cardiovascular interventions: A qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341568
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341568
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341568&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0341568?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.