IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0341273.html

Machinability and tribological optimization of origami-inspired Almond Shell–PMMA via RSM, ML, and TOPSIS

Author

Listed:
  • Biplab Bhattacharjee
  • S Sivalingam
  • Raman Kumar
  • Jasgurpreet Singh Chohan
  • Sandeep V.
  • Ripendeep Singh
  • Anupama Routray
  • Jibitesh Kumar Panda

Abstract

An integrated approach combining Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Machine Learning (ML-SVM) and TOPSIS optimization method is applied in this study to analyse the tribological behaviour of 3D printed patterns of almond shell-PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) origami inspired composites and machinability. The process of taking advantage of fold-based geometrical patterns (such as Miura-ori or triangular tessellation) to enhance load distribution and energy absorption in 3D printed specimen is called origami-inspired. These patterns promote a certain degree of structural rigidity and cause weakened materials to deform under applied stress in a controlled manner in general to improve the mechanical strength and wear-resistance. Besides tribological performance factors such as wear rate and friction coefficient, the factors to be evaluated on the machinability properties of cutting force, surface roughness and material removal rate include spindle speed (3000−9000 rpm), feed rate (0.05–0.15 mm/rev), and depth of cut (0.2–0.6 mm). Although the machine learning algorithms were able to make predictive models concerning wear performance and machinability, RSM was addressed to plan the experiments and conclusion of the parameters interaction. TOPSIS method identified the parameters combination that will serve the best by balancing between tribological efficiency and machinability. The novelty aspect of the current work is the inclusion of agricultural waste (10 percent almond shells) to the polymer matrices and and the use of a hybrid optimization strategy on the ways to optimize its functional properties with respect to being used in wear and machining applications. Notable findings indicate that the most influential variable affecting machinability and tribological results is the feed rate; in the best case scenario there is achievement of surface roughness of 1.2 10−15 m and wear rate aside at 1.5 in 10−4 mm 3/Nm. The proposed model was able to give a workable and industrially friendly composite method with great efficiency and sustainability in terms of optimization performance and predictability (R2 > 0.95).

Suggested Citation

  • Biplab Bhattacharjee & S Sivalingam & Raman Kumar & Jasgurpreet Singh Chohan & Sandeep V. & Ripendeep Singh & Anupama Routray & Jibitesh Kumar Panda, 2026. "Machinability and tribological optimization of origami-inspired Almond Shell–PMMA via RSM, ML, and TOPSIS," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-29, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341273
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341273
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341273&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0341273?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.