IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0341037.html

Prevalence and determinants of underweight, overweight, and obesity among reproductive-aged Bangladeshi women: Evidence from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2022

Author

Listed:
  • Ashim Kumar Nandi
  • Kh Shafiur Rahaman
  • Navira Chandio
  • Amit Arora

Abstract

Over the past two decades, underweight, overweight, and obesity have increased in Bangladesh, becoming a major public health concern. This study investigated the current prevalence and examined the determinants of underweight, overweight, and obesity among reproductive-aged Bangladeshi women. Using data from a weighted sample of 9,213 women in the 2022 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey, we applied multinomial logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with being underweight, overweight, and obese. Among 9,213 reproductive-aged women, the prevalence of underweight, overweight, and obesity was 10.0%, 18.9%, and 36.5%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified older age as the strongest predictor of overweight and obesity: women aged 35–49 years had nearly double the risk of overweight (ARRR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.62–2.50) and more than triple the risk of obesity (ARRR = 3.56; 95% CI: 2.90–4.38) compared to those aged 15–24 years. Other significant factors included higher wealth status (ARRR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.66–2.26 for obesity among wealthy households), media exposure (reading magazines: ARRR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.14–1.87, watching television: ARRR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.13–1.46), and parity (ARRR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.23–2.02 for obesity among women with 1–4 children). Breastfeeding and agricultural/manual work protected against obesity. We also found that currently breastfeeding women (ARRR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.13–1.72) and women who lived in Sylhet division (ARRR = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.13–2.12) were more likely to be underweight, while women with secondary or higher education, wealthier women, women aged 25 or higher, and women with 1–4 children were less likely to be underweight. Overall, a higher burden of underweight, overweight, and obesity exists in the sample. These findings emphasise the need for age- and context-specific interventions, such as promoting active lifestyles, regulating food environments, and incorporating nutrition education into maternal health programs, to combat rising obesity while addressing persistent underweight.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashim Kumar Nandi & Kh Shafiur Rahaman & Navira Chandio & Amit Arora, 2026. "Prevalence and determinants of underweight, overweight, and obesity among reproductive-aged Bangladeshi women: Evidence from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2022," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341037
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341037
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341037&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0341037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lovney Kanguru & Affette McCaw-Binns & Jacqueline Bell & Novie Yonger-Coleman & Rainford Wilks & Julia Hussein, 2017. "The burden of obesity in women of reproductive age and in pregnancy in a middle-income setting: A population based study from Jamaica," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvia Kirchengast & Beda Hartmann, 2018. "Recent Lifestyle Parameters Are Associated with Increasing Caesarean Section Rates among Singleton Term Births in Austria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0228862 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.