IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0340627.html

Evaluating others’ well-being: Survey experiment on fictional Japanese celebrities generated from wikipedia articles and ChatGPT

Author

Listed:
  • Takaharu Saito
  • Aguru Ishibashi
  • Zeyu Lyu
  • Zhemeng Xie
  • Sachiko Yasuda
  • Hiroki Takikawa

Abstract

Well-being attracts scholars’ and policymakers’ interests for decades. This study examines how respondents evaluate a “Good Life,” “Happy Life,” and “Meaningful Life” through the analysis of fictional celebrity articles using the supervised Indian Buffet Process (sIBP). We identify key patterns in well-being perception, highlighting the importance of artistic engagement, public influence, and career success across all three dimensions. While happiness is closely linked to career achievements and personal stability, meaning is driven by cultural and artistic contributions, and a good life balances both elements. Personal hardships negatively impact all three dimensions but are particularly detrimental to happiness. Conversely, creative contributions and public engagement enhance perceptions of a meaningful life. These findings suggest that external success and intrinsic fulfillment are both essential for well-being. Our approach demonstrates the value of computational text analysis in uncovering nuanced insights into societal conceptions of a fulfilling life, paving the way for further interdisciplinary research on well-being and perception.

Suggested Citation

  • Takaharu Saito & Aguru Ishibashi & Zeyu Lyu & Zhemeng Xie & Sachiko Yasuda & Hiroki Takikawa, 2026. "Evaluating others’ well-being: Survey experiment on fictional Japanese celebrities generated from wikipedia articles and ChatGPT," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340627
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340627
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340627&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0340627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.