Author
Listed:
- Shuai Zhang
- Shuai Zhang
- Jinhuang You
- Heming Jia
- Chuanmin Wu
- Chibiao Liu
- Laith Abualigah
Abstract
By emulating crayfish behaviors such as social foraging, rapid retreat from threats, and adaptive sensing, the Crayfish Optimization Algorithm (COA) achieves a dynamic balance between global search and local exploration, improving optimization efficiency. However, COA suffers from diversity degradation, insufficient exploration capability, low optimization finding accuracy, and easy fall to a local minimum. To solve these problems, an improved crayfish optimization algorithm (ICOA) is proposed. Firstly, the position of the population is achieved through the application of the Sobol sequence mapping in the initialization phrase, which enhances the diversity within the population. Secondly, a Lévy flight strategy is proposed in the foraging phase, which avoids algorithms fall into local optimization and enhances the individuals’ capacity for extensive exploration within the solution space. Subsequently, during the competition phase, using the Euclidean distance-fitness balanced competition strategy improves simultaneous development and exploration performance. To evaluate ICOA performance, the IEEE CEC2019 and CEC2020 benchmark functions and experiments were used in different dimensions for verification, followed by sensitivity analysis, quantitative analysis, and nonparametric statistical analysis. Furthermore, the effectiveness is validated in five engineering optimization problems, in which ICOA improved by 0.28%, 17.86%, 0.01%, 88.8% and 0.1%, respectively, compared to COA. ICOA exhibits enhanced optimization capabilities to tackle complex spatial and practical challenges. Incorporating multiple strategies markedly improve the efficacy of ICOA. This finding has significant implications in the field of engineering optimizations.
Suggested Citation
Shuai Zhang & Shuai Zhang & Jinhuang You & Heming Jia & Chuanmin Wu & Chibiao Liu & Laith Abualigah, 2026.
"An improved crayfish optimization algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-40, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0340464
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340464
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.