IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0340395.html

In their own words: A qualitative examination of student experiences with high-impact practices during the second-year transition

Author

Listed:
  • Austin L Zuckerman
  • Gregory J Stocker
  • Cheyenne N Mercer
  • Randy G Tsai
  • Thomas J Bussey
  • Stanley M Lo

Abstract

Researchers and practitioners have called for the use of high-impact practices to support student engagement and development in higher education institutions in the United States. Many studies have used quantitative methods to validate the importance of these practices in supporting broad academic and social outcomes, but fewer have used qualitative approaches to understand the range of outcomes that students perceive they are obtaining from these experiences. The development and evaluation of high-impact practices cannot be fully realized without leveraging student voices to understand the range of potential benefits that students acquire. Identifying practices that students perceive as valuable to their learning is essential for cultivating meaningful experiences that support student development and improve affective dispositions toward educational experiences. Second-year students are a particularly understudied population in higher education, facing unique challenges such as the “sophomore slump” that warrant increased access to high-impact practices. To complement existing literature on high-impact practices and second-year student development, this study applied a phenomenographic approach to analyze students’ experiences in a summer-bridge program that supported students (n = 133) through the second-year transition. Using weekly written reflections as a primary data source, student experiences and outcomes were examined across four dimensions of student development: academic, social, professional, and personal. Students reported a variety of positive outcomes from their consistent participation in these practices, with a range of benefits observed primarily in their academic, personal, and social enrichment experiences. Perceptions of professional development outcomes were notably less salient and less detailed compared to the other three dimensions, suggesting that the types of activities students chose in this category may have offered fewer immediate benefits. Implications for cultivating meaningful experiences in higher education that can support second-year students’ transition and development are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Austin L Zuckerman & Gregory J Stocker & Cheyenne N Mercer & Randy G Tsai & Thomas J Bussey & Stanley M Lo, 2026. "In their own words: A qualitative examination of student experiences with high-impact practices during the second-year transition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340395
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340395
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340395&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0340395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.