IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0340297.html

Mechanization-driven farmland consolidation and farm household labor allocation: Evidence from grain producers in Shandong, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Liu
  • Pengsong Ding
  • Xiubo Xia
  • Shuping Li
  • Qingpeng Sun
  • Tianjing Yang
  • Yufei Bu
  • Huanchun Zhang

Abstract

Mechanization-driven farmland consolidation has become a key component of China’s efforts to raise grain productivity and optimize rural labor allocation. We used a survey of 630 grain-producing households in Shandong Province, and combined a Tobit model with propensity-score matching to identify the causal effects of consolidation on farm-household labor decisions. Consolidation reduced on-farm labor input by 8.4 percentage points through labor-saving technological substitution, yet the magnitude differed sharply between two mechanization pathways. Where households purchased their own machinery, on-farm labor rose by 5.3 percentage points, consistent with specialization incentives. By contrast, the use of custom mechanization services lowered on-farm labor by 7.5 percentage points. Labor-saving effects were strongest among ageing households, smallholders and farmers in hilly areas, suggesting enhanced overall efficiency in constrained settings. Policy implications include expanding service markets, coupling consolidation with vocational training for off-farm employment, and establishing a long-run monitoring framework to ensure sustainable transformation. However, this study relies on cross-sectional data, which limits its ability to capture dynamic change processes. Future research could conduct longitudinal tracking studies to evaluate the sustained effects and sustainability of policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Liu & Pengsong Ding & Xiubo Xia & Shuping Li & Qingpeng Sun & Tianjing Yang & Yufei Bu & Huanchun Zhang, 2026. "Mechanization-driven farmland consolidation and farm household labor allocation: Evidence from grain producers in Shandong, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340297
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340297
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340297&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0340297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.