Author
Abstract
Background and objective: Current widely used depression assessment criteria may not accurately reflect the true prevalence of depression, and previous studies have insufficiently addressed the multidimensional nature of social support. Research on the relationship between depression and specific dimensions of social support remains limited, which impedes the targeted allocation of scarce social resources to mitigate the disease burden. This study aimed to explore the association between multi-dimensional social support and major depressive disorder (MDD) in the US population, using depression assessment criteria consistent with current epidemiological data. Method: We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). After propensity score matching (PSM), 123 participants with MDD (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥15) and 543 without MDD were included. Social support was assessed using five-dimensional questionnaires and each dimension was dichotomously scored (1 = presence of support, 0 = absence of support), yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Participants were categorized into three social support groups: Low group (0–1), Middle group (2–3), and High group (4–5). Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between social support and MDD, and subgroup analyses were performed to assess consistency across populations. Results: Compared with participants without MDD, those with MDD had significantly lower proportions of adequate social support across all five dimensions. Binary logistic regression analyses showed that higher social support levels were associated with a reduced risk of MDD (Middle vs Low group: odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22–0.73; P = 0.003; High vs Low group: OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08–0.29; P
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.